No Kings and the Silent March to Anarcho-Liberal Mistopia

19 June 2025.

Allow me to begin a likely controversial article with a still more controversial verse in jest, for I do promise that it will become itself relevant to the treating of this article.

'Donaldus, first King bethrusted,

Be I, of American fame,

The Fatherland I've been betrusted,

To make it great again,

A President* called Orange:

I've been free, unafeard,

The Government of the, South Spaniards,

Have I all-times revered!'.

— Het Donaldus

*That is, Steadholder

Anyone listening to the 24/7 news, or who has heard the call of Walton (one of his bastard progeny, not the Dark Master himself, thankfully), knows about the 'Nay Kings' protest, which ought to be more accurately betitled 'Rain on Parades' anti-cult. Now, you might be thinking this protest was targeted against the Trump cult of personality, but that should be my mistake: nayso indeed, for the anti-culture of liberalism should never permit the Folk to have any cult of any kind. The cults of nation, aristocracy, leadership, and eventually those of martial traditions and the pantheon of revolutionary heroes will be torn down by a transient liberal 'elite' (in name alone!).

It is my opinion that this model of liberal cultural liquidation can not maintain itself for ever. At some point, one reaches such a low level of base culture, that it is irremovable. Exempli gratia, redneckery, Suburbia-Hooligium, New England, Southronism, communism, fascism, and drugery are all distinct social beings whose culture at this level is too fundamental to their sociality ('culture' in the general mores or sociological sense): their world-view and social dwelling, to be any further ground down, without destroying that group in hostile actions, that is. I posit, too, that the Mexican and Canadian Folks are so close to their fatherlands, that they will at some moment of special weakness rebel against the liberal anti-culture of the US Federal Empire.

I mean to say that American populism, or American fascism, will by necessity be, not orthodox Mussolinism, but fascism with Mexican/Canadian characteristics. There is also the possibility of Christo-, Islamo-, or Hindu-fascism, which are international, universal or semi-universal, ideologies. Most Anglo-Americans will reject this like their fathers did, so many years ago, and in fact will like these cultural, socialitively diverse forms of fascism much less than the national orthodox fascism they might have had instead. Anti-cultural liberalism is the Sturmabteilung of pro-cultural fascism, for fascism is the cultural concession of capital, where social democracy is the economic concession.

I do not rightly know if Madam Walton is aware of that which she is opening the door to. My guess should be that she has somewhat the notion, but the call of her Master's coffers is upon her, too alluring. And she who calls for markets, must pay the merchants ten-fold, as the East might well educate her.

The United States, for once in its fumbling life, attempted to develop one of the hallmarks of a high culture, something which should have taken the wind right out of actual fascism's sails, only for its attempt to be decried as heretical by the ruling-class. Again, is it not proved that fascist decadence has nay closer ally than liberal degeneracy? Socialism must put a priority on rebuilding high culture if we are to stop fascism before it gains popular power.

The second problem which liberalism has, is the one notoriously shared with anarchism, it wishes for 'Nay Kings, Nay Masters, Nay Disciples'. This ideal leads, as Marxists know (or ought to), to libertine disorder and Red-guard terror. The only way that Gladsnost and Politstroika may function operably without destroying socialism, is if we recognise and accord both Central Committee and General Secretary the necessary respect and deference. Liberals and anarchists will in the end accomplish nothing by collapsing every tradition and 'vestige' of leadership and discipline (the latter being the result of true devotion in discipleship, which Comrade Lenin understood), except that they will clear the way for actual fascism.

One maxim which comrades must not soon forget is that there may be 'nay freedom without fealty'. We saw the catastrophic melt-down of the original Glasnost and Perestroika when there was nay respectable leadership to take account for the broken reforms, Comrade Gorbachev erroneously prioritising an idealistic, aloof conception of liberal freedom over his duty as General Secretary of a socialist state. How often otherwise grounded comrades begin to revolutionise against Party duties, as good little Enlightenened burghers should, at the very mention of such is to me confusing and in severe need of some Politstroika (Political Upstanding) . Nay one is calling for Stalin Æra, or even Lenin Æra grades of party discipline, and the Trump Government is nearly absent of any discipline or common political cohesion.

This discipline is but one way in which communists are closer to the aristocracy liberal capitalists such as Madam Walton fear, more than the disparate so-called MAGA ,,Movement'' ever will be. When exploiters like Walton go to bed at night, they see neither Charlottesville nor the Heer, neither Trump nor Hitler, but rather His Comrajesty Great Comrade Lenin, His Comrajesty Great Comrade Stalin, His Majesty Kaiser Wilhelm II, His Majesty King George III, and His Majesty King William III; all the monarchs throughout history haunt the nightmares of liberal burgherdom like a spectre (the spectre... of noble communism), and the worst of it, the carbuncles of His Comrajesty Kommkaiser Karl!

For you see, dear comrades, the liberal burgher fears nothing more than order— the opposite of which both their mode of production and culture rely upon and reproduce the conditions of —anarchy! There are many communists, past and present, who should in a sole instant correct our historical determinist optimism for capital's so far distant (utopian, say?) potential, joining hand-in-hand with our lords, fathers, king, kaiser, and Christ saviour, shouting 'God save the crown and sceptre of the natural order, Devil sell the infernal burgher rebels to the markets of Hell!'. I should pledge myself in such an esteemed fashion, if it could mean another chance at feudal socialism or Christian communism. Alas, Madam Walton is determined to stop me at any cost, even that destruction of the planet for future habitability.

I end by saying what is simple: Trump is nay monarch, and a monarch should be a glorious thing. I have been yearning for someone to call for noble account, to save the West with re-order and self-discipline, which must be a righteous measure, regardless his political quarter. Is any one at all surprised that the urban bandit Walton opposes the king's law, the noble obligation to protect the unwashed peasantry and townsmen from her wily golden watch, therein betailed? Think, comrades, before you pick up pitch-forks under lead(e) of the lion.

We are the Folk; God Save the King.

Post Scriptum. If one should be further interested in the discussion on balancing liberty and discipline to attain noble communism, I direct you to my first serious, if primitive or whelming, attempt to lay these all too important matters out, here. Notice that the first half of the article deals with a novel class analysis, which is not wholly imperative to the last two chapters of that article, those two being properly related to the subject discussed in this article.