Specifically on The Trump as Monarchist Polemic and The Nature of The Military Parade

21 June 2025.

Seeing just how hostile the liberal reception to the United States Military Parade has been, I feel the need to make a much more pointed article than that one posted yester-day, in which I indulged discourse on my related views. That is to say that I did not perhaps address the liberal claims themselves, feeling them to be, I confess, incredulous and out-right polemically brain-dead. This ought to be unsurprising, considering the forum. I am a Marxist, and have been thus for so long that I nay longer comprehend the... what we might call 'liberal ideological experience', or the 'world-view of liberalism'. This applies doubly so for US Liberalism ('Social-Liberalism, a mistopian night-mare of double-speak). Then let us proceed.

May I say most bluntly from the beginning that I despise the poor liberal disposition towards monarchy and feudalism, and I consider Trump nothing more than a burgher liberal jester, selling that same degenerate brand of consumerism and individualism, albeit with less gratuitous versions of the policies of wokery, overt anti-culture, imperialism, and pseudo-optimism. In every single policy, Trump is still a liberal imbecile, carrying the exact same mental disorder of ideological delusions that his detractors do— he is just more open about it, and not every group in his abnormally inclusive campaign tent is so afflicted. Trump is neither a monarchist nor a fascist, yet if liberals continue to make the former impossible, they will besure the latter, inevitable. What the United States, ravaged by the Federal Vassal system*, liberal anti-cultural individualism, and mass-migration in a time of societal decline and imperialist expeditions and plottings, needs at this moment is an executive that is not afraid to oppose liberal ideology and upholds noble accountability.

* The system of ,,national'' (Federal DC) centralisation of the US Imperial State, against the fifty provinces, and regional nations.

Let us look at two pretty clear examples which demonstrate that Trump is a liberal burgher, not a feudal aristocrat. States' rights are a fundementally feudal, anti-liberal nation-state, demand, echoing the rights, obligations, and relations pertaining to free cities in the feudal Holy Roman Empire. Did our most sovereign lord, His Noblest Majesty Kaiser Donald I of Oranje-Drumpfburg take every measure, risking impeachment to assassination, that he might return to his loyal subjects the rights granted them? Are the provinces and their comprising nations now free of the liberal imperialist yoke so tightly begrasped by the decomposing corpses under the command of favourite class-room skeletons 'Chucky' and 'Mitchell'? What is it that we do in such a righteous stead find to be the Trump edicts? On the sole issue of abortion, for all the other much more pressing affairs of the Cyningric of Americksland, burgher president Trump knew that the division betwixt the provinces should fall into the old national disunion of the US Federal Empire and the CS (Con)federal empire. Pope and Kaiser once more endorse the money-lenders and market-tenders, given say to the exclusion of the free steads and their domestic guilds and aristocracies, which is ultimately how the liberal process of authority degenerates society into capitalist imperialism. The one thing that should free the nations from this prison-house Union (hypothetically, of course), which Trump is actually likely to do, is the dissolution of the Union education system. But even this policy is a less preferable, wantonly liberalised decision to the alternative of truly nationalising the current Federal Imperial system, which chains these formerly sovereign slaves together. And if the Union education system were to be abolished, never the less has liberalism so infantilised us into retarded children, that I verily wonder whether society is capable of maturation any more. If the tyranny of imperial state education were to be torn down, could we embrace each other in freedom and build our sacred Academy of ald?

Sociality and culture, specially national sociality and high culture, when advancing to larger, more complex national units, are essential construction materials for the development of a well-functioning society. Not even delegating this project to real, self-intelligent AI could fix this problem. It is a mannish social being in which all members of a society must partake. Liberalism is an anti-social scheme, a cohort of men in whatever degenerate attire is called 'casual' that day, throwing stones through, not businesses which are sacred places, but through the windows of religious buildings, town-halls, libraries, gentleman's and citizen's clubs, and palaces. Perhaps they are screaming 'Arbeit macht frei; Kultur ist Sklaverei!' (or better, 'Verkaufen macht frei...', for are they not, too, afeard of these things which arise from the social hand of labour being risen from foreclosed ruins anew?).

Liberal burghers do not fear the actual Donald Trump, who in the end is yet one of them, committed wholly to burgher liberalism, should he sometimes strum upon the harped chords of aristostik and feudalism, that he may sate the yearning of the masses after so much of his usual crooked ten-pence pipe, produced on the mass-production lines of the smoggy inferno liberalism. Liberals in fact fear what could have been: what Trump could have done if he truly was a monarchist seeking the restoration of feudalism, what he could have done if he was secretly a fanatical communist as they imagined Sanders to be. But what, then, is Trump exactly? He is a liberal capitalist court jester dancing around, singing:

Attention liberal burgher lords,

Listen well, I tell dark words;

If you sever social cords,

And tear up every church's boards, The Folk shall sooner take up swords,

Ya, the Folk shall sooner take up swords.

Hearken, ho, hear heavy words,

The Folk shall then take up their swords!

That the liberal burghers tried to impeach their own jester ought to concern us gravely. If neither Sanders or Trump, then it must be Benito or Augusto (it will almost certainly not be Adolf), for I fear the Left is far too broken— fragmented, sectarian, liberally indoctrinated —for us to see another Vladimir Ilyich or Josip Broz any time remotely soon.

I support having a military parade every year hence. And why so? Not only is martial tradition an important part of establishing socio-political discipline and high culture, which I understand is an unpopular, personal motivation, due to liberal degeneracy and rhetoric, but I propose for two other, concrete reasons, which most, I hope, find favourable. Parades subject the military to the public opinion of the Folk, it is a form of noble accountability. Parades also pull regiments/companies out of the pool of imperialist forces able to respond, and further, it allows us to gather intelligence on the military, based upon the participants, the matériel (various weapons or vehicles displayed), and the general theme and logistic of the parade. I firmly contend that there is nay good reason to oppose annual military parades.

The last point I will make is on the over-arching class analysis surrounding this entire swirl of polemic and sloganeering. I promise to make it briefly, if practicable, but as a conservative communist I am nobly obligated to speak out against the poisonous slanders of the uncultured and uneducated liberal money-bags, these hedonous, self-serving narratives they pay handsomely to promulgate against our (alack non-existent) king and aristocracy. Liberalism, most specially that found on the so-labelled 'Right' and 'Left' in the US, is the most historically ignorant ideology to obtain state and societal rule. Liberals really oppose the just authorities of feudalism because kings, kaisers, and their aristocracies and clergies, are not completely beholden to the ravages demanded by capital, and have been known many times to turn against the burghers and their turgid lust for draining and destituting the subjects of His Majesty the King, whom they mistake to be first and foremost their little employee drones, their thralls with whom they have a tepid social contract, stipulating nay obligations to well-being outside extraction hours. Liberalism is, besides its final form, the most detestable, reprehensible, and absolutely most— to man —unnatural mental disease to have ever been thought of. It is the sole system to have possibly destroyed not just every fatherland, but the very planet these fatherlands reside on.

The future of socialism must abandon liberalism, and must learn from and adopt a new model feudalism. As liberals created a reformed army to institute their tyranny and societal degeneration, so must communists look inward, and make ready to forwards hold the Banner of Reform (per the saying). I readily admit that these views of mine stand in strong contrast to main-stream Marxist analysis. There is nay shame in smashing brittle pillars of orthodoxy, which is something, I fear, the Left must relearn. Remember, follow The Four Nosts and Stroikas; Fowards Hold The Banner of Reform (article on the former coming in a week).