There is something which is awry with modern science. Science has artificially been made inacceßible to the citizenry, no matter if their station and education would in earlier times permit them a basic cognition of the latest scientific developments. I posit that this new withholdal of kennage has been perpetrated by the new ecclesiastical order of bourgeois scientists.
The Roman Papist Church used the exclusivity of speechcraft to determine the 'proper' interpretation of the Bible, and to regulate acceß to it, thereby envaluing their priestly claß, when they produce no intrinsic value of their own. Is it not far-footed to presume that this same dynamic is being employed by the new bourgeois religious order (the cult of liberal scientific mastery and subjectivity)? Why do the lords of liturgical discovery aim to prevent us from evaluating the cogs and forming our own consensus through this? They (the liberal intelligentsia) have not only sought to convolute science, but even to entangle philosophy into an infinitely deepening sink-hole, and to remove basic medical kenning out of the minds of the people.
I think that the occurring conundrum except that we kenna that the baby is the spawn of a frost-giant, and the water is the most mineral-rich in the full universe. What we ought to do is throw the baby out of the water; throw the abomination of bourgeois science out of the pool of scientific kennage. Perhaps a roll-back reversion of science to 1700 is neceßary in dißecting this ulcer from the body of folcen science. We may feel disappointment at the initial loß, but is is required to build a folcly foundation for a freedom of learning.
Comments