The Shooting of Charlie Kirk and the Woke-Stalinist Road to Yezhovshchina

10 September 2025.

'Rather than dropping the fascist into the sun directly they are instead first sent to the frozen wastes of the Sol system, far from her warming light. At its furthest point a small burn is performed, followed by generations of darkness as they plunge towards incineration'.

—Red Phoenix, Organ of the Woke-Hoxhaist APL (details here)

'Up Yours, Woke-Stalinists!'

—Nikolai Bukharin; final words (alternative timeline)

Comrades, we start off with a contrast: a gruesome, despicable fantasisation, and a humourous epitaph, both for a very alarming event. Charlie Kirk, 'conservative' (Right-liberal) commentator and leader of the organisation Turning Point USA, has died by the hand, potentiality, of a Woke-Stalinist assassin. Whilst I do not know the reason or the perpetrator in reality, let us say a brief word about the archetype of terror which allowed this to happen.

Before we may continue, however, we must inevitably have a word on the terminology, which must be advanced at this point. The American Party of Labor, being a 'Leninist' (Woke-Hoxhaist) organisation, is actually a gross outlier in the world of modern Woke-Stalinism. Most Woke-Stalinists to-day are not Leninists at all, but are a strange coterie-sort of disgruntled social democrats, Browderite/Burnhamite exceptionalists, identitarian xenophobes, and Democrats attempting to pander or prove their ,,radicalism'' (ha ha!). Any good Marxist should see right through the act, but alas, most of the Left is not Marxist, and half of that Marxist majority has decided, for reasons strategic or moralistic, to compromise as Labour Compradors (namely those coming from the background of Professional Managerial Intellectual Patrons— the PIMPs of political discourse).

How many Woke-Stalinists have we heard make jokes about the assassination of President Trump, committing mass-murder against anyone that dared to vote for him, and for the unrelated gassing of truckers in extermination camps, not to mention the ice-pick jokes aimed at Comrade Trotsky? These were all played off as jests after the time they were made. I ask you now, Woke-Stalinist Chekists: is this merely another harmless, misinterpreted jest? A man is slain, and yet many Woke-Stalinists happily proclaim 'I cannot wait to shoot an ice-pick through Kirk's brain!'. Indeed, so you have, Woke-Stalinists.

This Woke-Stalinist clique of Yezhovites has violated all norms of decency and Gladsnost. Rather than begaging in debate within the forums of society (and party, but we will get there), the Yezhovites have opted to wage war against Marxism-Leninism, by committing attentats and mass terror (Blanquist homicide and suspicion), in the name of their wretched fabrication aptly named Woke-Stalinism. They have renounced the concepts of comradery and Gladsnost, in favour of wanton political slaughter, for the voice of their master Yezhov calls.

These are the same Woke-Stalinist wreckers who try to derail our parties. They seek to become the new Chekists of our movement, without being party comrades, first. They therefore believe the purge to be the proper political tool in all situations. They are nasty, short, and brutish, much like the Traitor Yezhov himself. As Comrade Lenin remarked upon the Yezhovite archetype:

'[Yezhovites are] too coarse and this defect, although quite tolerable in our midst and in dealing among us Communists, becomes intolerable in a [Chekist]. That is why I suggest that the comrades think about a way of removing [them] from that post and appointing []other m[e]n in [their] stead who in all other respects differ[]... in having only one advantage, namely, that of being more tolerant, more loyal, more polite and more considerate to the comrades, less capricious, etc'.

—Lenin's Testament

I have seen with my own eyes the handiwork, the modus operandi, of these Yezhovite wreckers. I did battle against this clique, in fact. But like Comrade Trotsky, and then Comrade Bukharin, I lost; the Woke-Stalinists had already done sufficient damage to the organisation that it dissolved. I was one of the founders and leaders, yet I could not save my organisation. This is the severe danger of which we are presently speaking.

The Woke-Stalinist (Yezhovite) danger in our parties is not an abstract ideological formulation, nor is it simply a slander against comrades of another mind from us. Charlie Kirk has been murdered by these assassins, as many comrades had been before. Why ought we to believe for a second that these Woke-Stalinists will not turn their pistols to our heads once they have killed all their Rightist political opposition?

But not to be one-sided, what do these Woke-Stalinists say in their defence when 'it's just a prank bro'' or 'it's just a take tho'' are absolutely regarded as insufficient account of their wicked, uncomradely manner? It is good we have the Woke-Hoxhaist American Party of Labor to answer our question directly:

'Perhaps when the Q come to judge us in the 24th century they will no doubt criticise our barbarity, but doubtless they would have to be a bit impressed by the style'.

—On the efficiency of launching fascists into the sun; Red Phoenix; APL

We ought to be impressed at the 'style' with which they murdered Charlie Kirk, and multitudes of old comrades besides! Oh yes, most impressive, executing your political opposition when your ideology is the most decrepit, simple-minded indentitarian-xenophobia that has appeared en masse since the last century. The Woke-Stalinist wreckers openly admit their pride of blood-splattered craft, the scum.

Let me now say something about the target of the heinous attack. To be blunt but respectful, I did not like Charlie Kirk in the way that I like, say, T S Eliot or Patrick Deneen. He has said too many detestable things for my personal taste, and I have thus only watched about two videos of him in my whole political career. That does not mean I am indifferent to him being ultimately Cancel-Purged by a bullet, which is, as we have spent all the above space stating, a horrendous, vulgar act which ought not to have occurred.

Some will weaponise this as a propagandistic lesson, remarking that 'he knew what was coming', with the inference being that his rhetoric and views led to this as the inevitable result. I warn starkly against this framing. How many times have comrades fallen into bitter, drawn-out debates with each other? How many times have comrades murdered each other? How many times has one of us felt we were being singled out for a vicious campaign by those we thought our comrades? Indeed, how many times has one of us had the thought 'my best friend and comrade would have killed me during the Yezhovshchina'? The answer to all these is far more than one imagines.

That is why we need the Four Nosts and Stroikas, comrades. We need such a policy to rebuild friendship and comradery, so that Yezhovite terror-purges and political assassinations are reduced to foot-notes in the rubbish bin of past history. Attentats are the method of bloodthirsty, infantile outbursts by Liberal and anarchist children. Politic is the world of adults.