Comrades, many of you are likely aware of the debate on the left with whether a socialist state can produce its own Means of Production (thereby skipping over capitalism). Marxist-Leninists answer in the affirmative to this question, with the caveat that it is not preferable to a natural capitalist development.
I have extended this reasoning to culture. Culture can be created only by feudalism, thus the question arises of whether a socialist state can create its own culture, too. I would likewise answer in the affirmative, but only if there is enough of the previous culture to duplicate. If a single land utterly floods its folk with immigrants, then cultural production is impoßible (so the socialist experiment shall begin decaying into rank Economism until final dißolution).
This leads me to the main point: Communists must take a distinctly pro-culture approach in order to defeat the liberal politic. Maß-immigration is not a Communist idea, it is a capitalist plot to lower wage costs, and if neceßary, to completely dis-empower (and in a hypothetical worst case dystopian scenario, completely replace) the domestic citizenry should it take up implacable arms against capitalist dominion. Immigration should be allowed in small quantities, with the stipulation that the immigrant go immediately back to their land as soon as their purpose for it is done (which means that they cannot 'move' there).
Liberals are not our friends, for they are enemies of the inhabiting folk. If we take immigration to its end-future conclusion, there will be unused lands with too few people to support themselves, and there will be great power lands over-burdened with maßes of unsustainable immigrants, causing a race war over the direst eßentials. No one wins in the end point of global maß immigration, not even the capitalist buffoons who precipitated the crisis. If Communists are to win, we must make a materialist critique of anti-cultural policies.
Comments