The Soviet Union and the Eastern Bloc has fallen. Communism as we knew it has proven failed. I am here to stand up and say 'it is time to forge the New Form', the future path toward socialism. This New Form of socialism will be peculiarly American, in fact I also call it 'Socialism with American Innovation'. Though the government of the United States may not be socialist, the American nation is: Anglo-America was grown from the Anglo-Saxon conception of folcweald (folk-rule). America does not need to abolish private property in order to establish socialism, or folk-rule. As Comrade Gorbachev and Comrade Deng made apparent to the world, a better kind of socialism is just waiting to be birthed; a New Form of socialism, a New Form that adheres to the statutes of the Restored (New) Economic Policy, the R(N)EP.
The New Form is the final synthesis between the thesis, humane socialism, and the anti-thesis, efficient capitalism. Market reforms are not to be feared as reversions to capitalist exploitation, but as a utilisation of capitalism to serve the maßes. If the people hold most or all of the private property, then to eliminate private property is to eliminate the well-being of the people, and is therefore an act of anti-socialism. American socialism is firmly rooted in a richer, more historical folk-feeling of our Anglo-Saxon forefathers, a context which bestows upon us greater knowledge of marketing than Marx or Engels could have poßeßed. We should use this knowledge to build a brighter socialism, not forsake it for dogmatic slogans which bear no weight off of the backs of the people in the modern æra.
One last thing I would like to add: social-democracy and American Liberalism is the real enemy of socialism. Socialism is supposed to function 'from each according to his ability'. These two ideological dogmas are fundamentally opposed to this credo. Welfare is the epitome of lazy anti-socialist degeneration of the worker. It is only natural that those players attracted to these two diseases are of the feminist, nationalist (not to be confused with patriot), homosexual, and basically all the rest of the off-shoots of the demented hippie and its ilk. American socialists must protest these fools whenever the opportunity presents itself, for they endanger the New Form's blooming implementation. Where is the evidence that these ideological dogmas sabotage production (and hence the people's livelihood? I quote from a Soviet Novosti preß pamphlet:
'The democratism of street-corner meetings cannot replace labour activism and strikes cannot enhance production efficiency. It is impoßible to halt railway traffic and simultaneously expect better supplies. Emotions could never replace common sense anyway'.
'Do you mean the miners' strikes?'
'Yes I do, and not only that. Theirs are just demands. But then meeting them would increase the state deficit by a corresponding sum. There are no other sources [of government revenue]. This means that if a sum is distributed among all the population, the extra benefits have cost roughly 10 roubles per resident including women and children.' -Leonid Abalkin, Novosti Preß, all italics mine.This quotation demonstrates one unacceptable fact quite plainly, that the American Liberal and the Franco-German social-democrat does not give a single sickled damn about maintaining a well-balanced socialist state budget, instead opting to court public opinion and turning it against hardworking lawmakers and economists (true socialists!) like Comrade Abalkin. These two cliques are leeches whose final and single aim in life is to steal from the people and the state, particularly if said entities are socialist. This is all to say, Liberals and social-democrats are, and can by reason only ever be the most virulent strain of anti-socialist.
Comments